Displaying results 51 through 100 of 681 entries found.

Submitted by ThatGalaxyMemist on June 20, 2020, 9:49 p.m. 1 point | 17 comments

I have noticed that in many countries if a woman rapes a man, it is not deemed as sexual harassment/assault. Do you believe action should be taken?

Submitted by xdshohet on June 19, 2020, 8:36 p.m. 1 point | 103 comments

I mean it's so stupid I can't believe someone actually cares about that

I've looked through a little through this sub and noticed that the sub showcases a lot of misandry. I understand that misandry is not the same as mysoginy because misogyny effects women systematically while misandry doesn't effect men at all however I've noticed that many of you are transphobic. For example you don't count trans women as women and from what I've seen from these post the reason is because they have a different chromosome pair. Although chromosomes usually can distinguish sex they don't always since men can have XX chromosomes and women can have XY chromosomes even at birth. So this begs the question are women with XY chromosomes still women to you?

Submitted by anime_lean on June 19, 2020, 5:17 p.m. 1 point | 18 comments

like bro imagine if men were expected to take care of their appearance it would be pretty sick imo

Submitted by Me_Name_is_Gregary on June 18, 2020, 10:47 p.m. 1 point | 21 comments

Earlier I made a post asking if yet could be healthy heterosexual relationships. The answers varied but some said that they were possible, but rare. My goal as of now is to be the best man I can possibly be, not to glorify myself but to be a man that people enjoy being around. What traits would I need to be in a good relationship?

Submitted by blazer_angel on June 18, 2020, 9:34 p.m. 1 point | 24 comments

I understand that men have commited more crime than women but even so most men but with that logic wouldnt you hate blacks more because they commit more crime than any other race in america. I just believe its a dumb justification to hate on men.

Submitted by Me_Name_is_Gregary on June 17, 2020, 10:24 p.m. 1 point | 24 comments

A while back I asked a question and some people said they were in a happy heterosexual relationship. Do you think that there can be happy male-female relationships where both are treated as equal?

Submitted by TheLotusLover on June 17, 2020, 3:03 p.m. 1 point | 6 comments

And what percentage of men would you assume is living most of their life sober in this day and age?

Submitted by BidenIsTooSleepy on June 17, 2020, 1:01 p.m. 0 points | 40 comments

Seems like all this sub does is complain. And many of the complaints aren’t invalid. But honestly you seem to enjoy your victim status.

I saw a post about a girl complaining that she is expected to allow her boyfriend to follow hot girls on Instagram.

This isn’t a thing. There is no societal rule that forces you to do this. You could easily find a guy who didn’t do this, but you’d likely call him an incel / Nazi because he doesn’t agree with you on abortion.

I guess my question is, what is your goal? You don’t seem to have one besides complaining. There seems to be obvious solutions to your problems that you willfully ignore. Ironically this sub seems to desire that women be treated like they were in the 50s; yet it also says the 50s were tyrannical oppression of women...

What do you want?

Submitted by dobeye on June 17, 2020, 12:04 a.m. 1 point | 23 comments

A popular feminist talking point that I've seen is that men don't understand the struggles of women because they've never experienced those struggles, and men can never fully understand patriarchy because they've never really experienced it. I'm just trying to understand how this argument works (or doesn't work) the other way round. Many anti feminist subreddits would gladly lists statistics biased against men, and state the if you don't think that counts as discrimination then you can't understand matriarchy because you're not a men, and you have female privilege.

To clarify: I am talking about more than mere sexdolls. As you may or may not be aware - advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics are paving the way for the mass scale manufacturing of artificial companionship for men. This is a step further than sex dolls who only satisfy basic sexual needs. These are lifelike dolls/robots imbued with artificial intelligence, emotional expression, and machine learning, that provide rudimentary social interaction as well as realistic sex simulation. These things are so advanced that they are marketed as artificial girlfriends.

If there any foreseeable problem with men purchasing an artificial companion and thus fulfilling that need for sex, companionship, and interaction? The obvious question is why not get a real girlfriend and the answer is equally obvious: They ether can't (due to injury, handicap, zero social skills, phobia of real women, etc) or they just don't want to for any number of reasons; but that all too human need for companionship, to love and care and form a connection is still there.

I believe that most women are neither attracted nor interested in the sort of men who would seek these artificial companions. This is a solution for the majority of those men who are just not wanted by the opposite sex and so could fulfill those needs through these artificial hosts instead of bothering real women with their pent up sexual angst.

These machines are also being used in brothels so that there are no real women there working in prostitution. These brothels are the first in history that do not have actual prostitutes (women) in them. Is this something that could be palatable from the PinkPill viewpoint since it is further separating the genders in that women no longer have to be physically present for men to satisfy their sexual needs?

I am interested in PinkPillers' thoughts on this one. Thanks.

Submitted by basicbloop on June 16, 2020, 1:20 p.m. 1 point | 105 comments

Ive heard many women in my friend circle say men dont need a mens day. Because every day is mens day. Thoughts?

907
Submitted by echartreuse on June 15, 2020, 7:33 a.m. 1 point | 3 comments

This arises out of an argument in another thread. I’m thinking of women who are ardent forced-birthers, who take affirmative voluntary steps to FGM their daughters, who advocate for the repeal of women’s suffrage, who tell Pew pollsters that it was righteous for Muhammad to rape young girls, who tweet that “TERFs” deserve rape, too.

In my view they aren’t exactly the same as men, because they’re unlikely to physically attack you. But, not all women are allies. Women who are infected hosts carrying a toxic false consciousness are enemies, too. They are welcome to switch sides but until they do, we should realize they want us dead or enslaved and we should regard them accordingly.

Submitted by TheDBotv on June 15, 2020, 4:26 a.m. 1 point | 3 comments

Quarantine it, delete it, whatever! This sub is one of the most sexist hellholes I’ve ever seen! Sorry your boyfriend, dad, or husband mistreated you, that doesn’t mean mass genocide of men is justified you sick fucks! I treat people with the same respect they treat me with, and I don’t think calling me subhuman for the way I’m born is okay. I don’t hate women, I don’t hurt women in anyway, but no matter what I do, I’m dirt to everybody on this sub. Why can’t we live in a world of equality? Why don’t we treat each other with kindness and respect? Why do people have a predetermined way of treating somebody based on how they are born? Incels are few and far between, I PROMISE. Abusive losers are also VERY FEW AND FAR BETWEEN. In this echo chamber, you wouldn’t believe it, but that’s reality. This sub is a very bad coping mechanism for your trauma, and I hope all of you change for the betterment of humanity. Anyway, me and all the guys in my neighborhood have women and children to abuse, catcha later!

Submitted by ImpDeathTrooper on June 15, 2020, 3:10 a.m. 1 point | 16 comments

Personally I crossdress and draw myself towards femininity. I love to feel pretty and manicured, to shave my legs and embrace strong perfumes. Though im still a man. Femininity is a part of who I am though I don’t let it define me nor do I express my femininity in a toxic way.

Submitted by AtheistJeww on June 14, 2020, 11:46 p.m. 2 points | 7 comments

PinkPillers complain about male arrogance and entitlement but at the same time expect men to be masculine and approach (FDS docet), so what's the best way to do so? Let's say we are at a club, bar, cafe, bookstore or any place where people are not busy and are just enjoying their free time instead, how does a good man/HVM/or whathever you call it approach a woman he finds interesting?

As a feminist ally this is tough equilibrium for me to understand and the advice I get is often contradictiory. The re has been a push from liberal feminists to make women approach, I've read many articles from liberal feminists that encourage men to only approach a woman when she gives clear signs of interest or better to wait until she makes the first move, Bumble is considered a feminist-friendly app for a reason. PinkPillers understand that often men do the approaching in a bad and entitled way but at the same time expect men to make all the approaching and showcase their masculinity in doing so. What is the best way for a man to approach a woman?

Submitted by anime_lean on June 13, 2020, 7:08 p.m. 7 points | 1 comment

like, she says it's just to hide her body or whatever, but if that was literally the only reason she dresses like that then i doubt her fits would be as cohesive and meaningful as they are

there's a clear difference between sloppy oversizing and intentional oversizing, and billie eilish's style is most definitely a case of the latter, you can really see the beats taken from classic hiphop and workwear styles and other genres of streetwear, contemporary and classic incorporated into her personal sense of fashion, and the way she experiments with the art of silhouetting is honestly beautiful, and definitely something some legendary designers like rei kawakubo have done before and would be proud of

i feel like hiding her body is only a tertiary thing, tons of people in the international fashion community do dress in oversized grunge fits like that, men and women alike, but she feels the need to act like that's a main reason when questioned about it because, that's the only way a lot of people accept, since they expect all womens fashion to be at least partially in service to the male gaze, and any deviation from that is completely incomprehensible to them outside of just "ugh she's just a prude trying to hide her body", so that's the reason billie eilish gives

Submitted by [deleted] on June 13, 2020, 5:14 a.m. 0 points | 71 comments

[deleted]

Submitted by dragonquest8 on June 13, 2020, 2:27 a.m. 2 points | 85 comments
Submitted by whysoworthless_ on June 12, 2020, 7:09 p.m. 0 points | 3 comments

Obviously I'm talking about the +18 relationships.

Submitted by SnowAssMan on June 12, 2020, 8:51 a.m. 15 points | 38 comments

It keeps racking up more & more views. There are constantly new comments talking about how "educating" the video is. People even mention that schools are using the video. Every other comment is your predictable "TERF" hate comment.

The viewers seem to be so easily taken in by Contra's soft-spoken sophistry. It's nothing more than an elaborate anti-feminist video with additional jabs at GNC non-binary people (as usual).

Surely if you can't get it removed for sexism, you can for being transphobic against non-binary people.

Here is the video btw & the transphobic bit starts at: 10:43 & is especially severe at: 11:11 in case you guys decide to flag it.

Submitted by SnowAssMan on June 12, 2020, 8:32 a.m. 10 points | 19 comments

This is how to respond when someone brings up this rather off-topic "gotcha" "argument". No further elaboration necessary.

Submitted by [deleted] on June 12, 2020, 7:47 a.m. 0 points | 6 comments

[deleted]

Submitted by stuckathomeagain on June 12, 2020, 2:30 a.m. 9 points | 12 comments

I’m curious as to how many feminists have read it, what they think, and how they feel about the twitter hate that came afterwards? (Responses like ‘suck my dick’ to a sexual assault survivor etc etc)

Submitted by MoonLaughter on June 12, 2020, 2:11 a.m. 1 point | 6 comments

Gigolo is a male sex worker who services women.

Submitted by RadeCrow on June 11, 2020, 10:50 p.m. 0 points | 50 comments

I’m 14m and no this isn’t a troll I genuinely just don’t understand how you can hold these views. I’ve seen posts on r/pinkpillfeminism claiming all men have no empathy. I’m willing to debate if you want I just don’t understand, I can feel empathy so then doesn’t this disprove your point? Or would this make me part of the 0.0000000001% of good males? I think just the fact that I know what they’re saying doesn’t apply to me disproves most of their points and I’ve seen the sub talk about teenagers in bad light too not just grown men. Anyway if anyone wants to explain/debate I’m open.

Submitted by [deleted] on June 11, 2020, 6:13 p.m. 2 points | 2 comments

[deleted]

Submitted by nonpenishaver on June 11, 2020, 4:35 p.m. 36 points | 30 comments

Why are you so full of irrational hate for us poor men? You pinkpillers should be grateful to men for giving you rights and not raping and beating you every day like we could.

Also you're evil for trying to tell me that porn is bad. It makes my peepee hard to watch women being raped and beat.

Also I was abused by my ex girlfriend (she said no to anal) do you pinkpillers think I deserved abuse because I'm male?

Submitted by Nearby-Impact-8442 on June 11, 2020, 3:03 p.m. 1 point | 15 comments

I don't think it's a concept yet, but as an idea, I think it's clear. The point is that to some extent men would feel guilty about their biological sex and social position toward women. This emotion could then possible lead to different behavior in men. They would then be more compassionate and friendlier towards women. Do you think this could bring some positive change?

Submitted by Friendly-Fall on June 11, 2020, 3:41 a.m. 3 points | 53 comments

Just wanted to know your answers in a hypothetical futuristic situation:

if you advocate for permanent female separation, wouldn't it be possible that way because men can finally be stopped from pursuing you?

Say artificial wombs and possibly companion robots are made mainstream, you can simply criminalize any interaction a male and a female would have, to protect the female (assuming that all men are sadistic pedo rapists). Men will reproduce using the artificial wombs (women will control the artificial wombs by fixing a price on the eggs and men simply pay when a baby is successfully made) and the female children would be sent to women to be raised. You might even consider surgical sterilization procedures to permanently rid yourself of periods.....or have sex selective abortion from a sperm bank if you want your own girl children.

It would just be like sharia based countries where the genders are completely segregated, except this time that's even inside the family and men will be severely criminalized for pursuing real women (this could be justified especially when they have possibly better coping mechanisms such as AI robots and artificial wombs)

In outside society, you can have female only companies, female only government branches and female only hospitals and stores, female only universities etc and a female only military and police force.

Why not throw in a female consulate for those gossip lovers who want to know what is happening on the male side. All entertainment and media would also be gender segregated as women would make their own media.

Would this be the ideal scenario for you?

Submitted by shocktreament on June 10, 2020, 2:13 p.m. 1 point | 2 comments

Using a throwaway because I've decided to separate my GC/feminist activity from my other account for reasons that are obvious.

I've been active on various gc/pinkpill subs for some time now and these are my observations of this sub. I'll try to provide some examples to make it clear what separates a good question from a moronic one. This is for reference for any moid who gets angry when his stupid question isn't taken seriously, but I guess that type of person wouldn't bother reading this either. Whatever, I have time on my hands to write this out so why not.

The types of questions men (and sometimes pickmes) ask on this sub:

1. Genuine questions. These are few and far between of course. They can range from questions of curiosity, like "What do you guys think of X thing" ([example](/archives/askpinkpillers/gihba0/)1) ([example](/archives/askpinkpillers/gsdh4v/)2) or personal questions, like "How can I support my mom/sister/girlfriend better" ([example](/archives/askpinkpillers/gk6ujw/)3) This example in particular is probably my favorite question ever on this sub, not to over congratulate OP for trying to be a better human being. These kinds of questions are the questions this sub is for, some concrete question we can give our opinions to directly. You don't have to agree with us or pander to us for it to be a good question, it can simply be something you're curious about.

2. Obvious bait. I won't bother providing examples, but to be clear I mean bait for bait's sake, where OP is baiting on purpose. Don't be mad if we call you a retard or even worse, gasp! We don't give you any attention.

3. Stupid, but genuine, bullshit question that isn't intended to be bait. There is a very important distinction between question type 2 and 3— in this kind I'm referring to stupid questions by angry teenage boys who genuinely believe they are asking a question— or rather giving us a GOTCHA! I differentiate it from just straight-up bait because they actually think they are asking us something, which is where the "I thought this was a sub for questions!! Why won't you feminazis answer my rational question!" Comes in. Here is a prime example (4). OP claims to not be baiting, that she's asking a genuine question, and I believe that she believes that. If you take the time to look through the comments you'll see plenty of well thought out, articulated responses, most of which she never bothered to reply to. To be fair that post did blow up and it's possible she got overwhelmed and couldn't answer every single response properly.

A better example (5): OP in this case promises to respond to every response. Again I don't consider this "bait" because I think OP actually is genuinely asking a moronic question. If you look at his response to one of the top comments, he betrays his total lack of understanding of the WORLD, not even just feminism or pinkpill as a whole. He either edited or deleted it now, but at some point he responded to acid attacks as "women can use acid against men too", because he's so stupid he only knows acid attacks as the physical sense of using acid against someone, not the way acid has a long and horrible tradition in many places of the world of being used against women who disobey or "shame" men, so that they are scarred forever and no longer have worth to other men so that they are easier to control and abuse. In another (edited or deleted) comment he replied to "honor killings" something along the lines of "I don't know what that is but i assume it's when two men fight over a girl, lots of women like that" what?? He admitted to not knowing something and instead of googling it he made such a strange and almost laughable assumption?

One last example (6). Again very close to bait, might very well be bait but considering the specificity of the question let's assume for example's sake it isn't entirely bait. Also he insists it isn't bait. Whatever. I'll just point out this comment thread which made me laugh.

In any case, my point is not to shame the couple examples above, just to illustrate what this sub is for since apparently a lot of moids are illiterate. This sub, like any other sub of this nature, is for discussion.

A good question is:

  • one that allows for discussion; whether it's because you agree with us and want our two cents or because you disagree and want to see why we believe the things we do, or you don't disagree or agree but are simply curious.
  • That's it. Not that complicated.

A bad question is one that does not allow for discussion, either because

  • You have such a lack of knowledge of reality as a whole (like the dude who didn't even know what an honor killing is), there is no way your incendiary question can leave room for discussion because we can't discuss with you what you don't bother to understand. How are you going to say "prove to me why men are evil", then when given proof you don't even bother to google it, let alone listen?
  • You aren't actually interested in discussion as much as proving your own point. This is where it gets close to bait, and where we'll reply "stop baiting" and you reply "BUT IT ISNT EVEN BAIT WHY WONT YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION REEE". Maybe you truly do not think it is bait because you didn't intend to bait, but we see it as bait. If all of your responses are just combative, barely even registering people's responses, then getting mad (or righteous) when people don't respond, thennnn that's pretty close to bait.

The distinction between a bad question and bait is that you aren't self-aware enough to realize it's bait, so you come off the sub thinking "Wow another day of stupid femininazis not even bothering to answer my question on a sub made for questions. This proves men are more rational. Time to scratch my balls and sniff my hand after."

We're not here to be your argumentative punching bag. We experience enough of that bullshit in real life.

Submitted by IgnatiousFeather on June 10, 2020, 6:07 a.m. 0 points | 122 comments

What do you think chanting "boys are bad!" "Toxic masculinity!" "The future is female!" Does to a young impressionable boy? What affect do you think it will have on them to grow up and be told all this? Imagine if you were that young boy being told this?

898
Submitted by [deleted] on June 9, 2020, 1 a.m. 0 points | 43 comments

[deleted]

Submitted by Maji404 on June 8, 2020, 7:54 p.m. 2 points | 8 comments

1st and 2nd wave feminism was very clear. However, today it doesn’t seem to have set goal(s)?

Submitted by CeratedOlly on June 8, 2020, 5:58 p.m. 4 points | 67 comments

I know you think a lot of stereotypical male qualities are negative, such as us being more outgoing and potentially violent, but do you believe there are any qualities that are more prevalent in men typically? That’s not to say that one good quality improves us as a gender in your eyes.

I guess this could lead the the question of do you think men serve any positive purpose in today’s society?

This is not bait, it’s a genuine question

Submitted by [deleted] on June 8, 2020, 10 a.m. 0 points | 47 comments

[deleted]

Submitted by Teal_Kitten on June 8, 2020, 4:41 a.m. 9 points | 90 comments

Would the pink pill stand up for all the tweens getting sex trafficked in England? Here in the UK our government has decided that it's in the public's best interest to not address the problem of rape gangs. It seems to me that the sensibilities of middle eastern men are being prioritised over the safety and lives of young British girls.

i want to expose myself to as many different ideas as possible but despite being XX myself i feel more comfortable posting here. I'm used to being banned for asking questions but i always sincerely want to know.

Submitted by somecudds on June 8, 2020, 3:26 a.m. 2 points | 82 comments

i think there's some way to make babies using bone marrow or whatever. i assume that this method would result in severe disabilities.

either way, if there was actually a way to live without men would you support it?

if so, how do you think that you will be able to enforce the idea of eradicating all men.

sorry if i'm generalizing, i just know there are people out there that legitimately want to get rid of men.

Submitted by hoopymoopydoo29 on June 8, 2020, 2:22 a.m. 1 point | 2 comments

... Nothing much to explain here. Would like an answer because I see you people say it all the time.

Submitted by clwabs on June 7, 2020, 10:47 a.m. 1 point | 96 comments

This is for male and female people.

..........just wanted to see what it felt like to ask random moid-type questions on here. Trying to put myself in their shoes.

Submitted by KnifeInHeart on June 6, 2020, 6:38 p.m. 1 point | 7 comments

I know Candace Owens has made a lot of public opinions about feminism, politics, and BLM movement in general but I want to hear a PP response (preferably from someone very engaged and knowledgeable with the BLM movement) to respond to the following two statistics/points:

1. You have a 25% higher chance of dying at the hands of the police as a White criminal than you do as a Black criminal. (no source provided) She goes on to say the total number of unarmed Black men killed last year was nine, compared to 19 unarmed white men.

2. She refutes the notion that black vs white have disproportionate police brutality rates for their population size since Black people commit a disproportionately of crime (Essentially, police brutality claims are proportional to criminal-activity rates). She backs up this assertion with the following statistic: 6% of the population (Black men) account for 44% of all homicides (so this excludes crimes that are more easily influenced by racial bias in the justice system). (Sources were not provided)

So if Black men have significantly higher rates of police encounters due to higher rates of criminal activity and yet still have lower instances of death-by-cop than white criminals the idea of racially motivated police brutality is a myth.

She also dismisses this particular episode as evidence that this is an epidemic because all professions (she uses doctors as an example) will have instances of malpractice/even outright sociopathy....but cherry picking those cases does not mean a systemic issue is the problem.

Thoughts?

Submitted by OhDearGod666 on June 5, 2020, 8:05 p.m. 1 point | 16 comments

I know a lot of pink pill women want a separate society, and are also more pro-socialism, but there are trade-offs with the unknown. I think #metoo has helped shine a light on how predatory men are in general, but at least you have stability, or at least you know how bad it is currently. But if there is revolution, or instability, you don't really know how bad it might get for women.

I think pink-pillers are a bit deluded with their narrative on how many rapists are out there - but I do think society in general is also too generous of their assessment of men. But here's the real question here is - how many more men would become rapists if there was free-reign.

I've heard some pretty horrendous accounts of the chinese police and HK protestors. With the current climate in the US, in a lot of areas law enforcement is basically on hold for long stretches of time. And in some cases, people like this are in charge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=RkwlDBLT_eI&feature=emb_title .

So where is your line? When you hear about 57 Buffalo poliece officers resigning, is that whoo-hoo for down with the current patriarchy, or is that boo-hoo for the rise of a new rapist-order?

Submitted by smashman3 on June 5, 2020, 5:50 p.m. 1 point | 26 comments

I've found that many people have differing opinions on this, what is your definition?

Submitted by DangerousRiver9 on June 5, 2020, 10:57 a.m. 1 point | 3 comments

How do I get in touch with a pink pill mod? Ive tried messaging a couple of times and I never get a reply back.

Before any of you answer 0%, I bet some of women you don’t get along with in here.

Answer accordingly lol

Submitted by TheTatteredOne on June 5, 2020, 9:22 a.m. 1 point | 41 comments

I know I’m opening pandora’s box here.

There’ll of course be lots of “emotionally available” type answers, and sure, you’re free to say that, but financially, physically—which attributes put a guy in that category?

Then, just as importantly, in which ways would you expect his woman to measure up?

Submitted by LolwithPain on June 4, 2020, 7:49 p.m. 1 point | 7 comments

I'm more looking for someone to ask advice from than a question, if that's allowed here.

Preferably someone who has been pinkpilled for a while and used to be or has had a romantic relationship with men or is currently in a relationship with one.

Let's face it we're all only human and living 100% to my ideals is more difficult than I thought it'd be, so I need a little help and guidance or advice from someone who knows and has experienced more than me.