Why do RadFems think they have the power to live without men?
Submitted Dec. 21, 2020, 1:43 p.m. by deviumsI’ve seen a lot of posts and comments by radfems saying that a society of all women would be a utopia. Then why doesn’t it exist yet? It doesn’t exist because nature dictates that the strong will always dominate the weak. A society of all women might be all sunshine and rainbows but it would only exist for a few hours before a stronger society would come along and just kick it down and take its resources.
There’s a post on pinkpill that says “all matriarchal societies were successful until men burned them down”... well guess what: if they were able to be burned down then they weren’t successful. The ability to defend your society is the first and most basic prerequisite for success.
85 comments recovered from the Pushshift database.
So what I'm reading is that men are inherently violent and should be avoided at all costs.
Thanks for clearing that up, regular r/IncelsWithoutHate poster.
Nature is violent and men happen to be the best at it.
So why are you still an incel? Why don't you go take what you want with violence RIGHT NOW, and see how far that gets you? Or are you more comfortable with your current standard of living created on the backs of better men than you, giving you the freedom to whine about the existence of radfems in your corner of the internet?
Read my posts on r/incelswithouthate and you can see that I’m not an incel haha. Good try though! Still no answer as to why you won’t set up a society similar to these Kenyan women. Looking at their infrastructure it seems like it would only take you about a day or so to catch up with or even surpass their “successful” society.
Just because I support women's desire to get away from violent animals like you doesn't mean I'm not okay with where I personally am.
Now it's your turn to answer the rest of my questions.
So if you’re okay with where you are then you are okay with where the patriarchy has placed you. I too am okay with where I am which has also been provided to me by our patriarchal society. The difference between us is that I am defending the structures that have gotten us to where we are and you are attacking it.
Women bring life into the world and without children, there is no society. And men know that and that’s why they must control us. The power of life is the ultimate power.
Women AND men bring life into the world. One without the other is completely useless.
Actually science has already shown that we don’t need sperm to make life. We can just take the DNA from a second egg. I’m afraid that you are now obsolete
That same science shows that the embryos made that way have malformations and we’re still a long way from being able to do it with humans. Science is just as close to being able to use artificial wombs. So we are both needed today and tomorrow we will both be obsolete. Nice try though!
Just because you haven't heard of something doesn't mean it doesn't exist lol.
Could you please give an example of a successful all female society then?
These ladies in Kenya.
I said successful not a bunch of people that live in huts in the desert.
They are successful. They live without men, they maintain their society, they haven't been destroyed. Don't move the goalposts.
If they are successful then why don’t you go live with them RIGHT NOW, or take all the radfems on Reddit and move to a similarly resource barren area that no one else cares to conquer and set up an identical society. Is it maybe because you like the standard of living that is afforded to you by patriarchal societies? And if it is the case that you won’t follow their lead because their standard of living is too low then they are not successful.
Did you have a good-faith question here, or did you want to gloat about sharing a chromosome pattern with predators?
Because this is not the flex you think it is.
My question is why are radfems upset with the patriarchy when it is the structure that has allowed our species to create societies that are as advanced as the ones we have today.
Actually, your original question was more along the lines of "why can't you radfems accept that men will always be violent and dominating?"
But fine, I'll answer this question again: because we see problems in the current system that don't benefit us, and we want to change those. This is how societies become advanced in the first place. What you want is stagnation, probably to avoid your own personal growth to accommodate a changing world.
You answered your own question didn’t you by stating male violence, what women are trying to escape, is why there aren’t more matriarchal societies.
Two rule breaks on this post:
No. 3 no trolling, serious questions only.
No. 5 must assign flare
Fix this please or I will remove it.
If you can’t practice good faith post please go back to MRA subs thanks
This question is too stupid for me to attempt to answer.
Wow. Matriarchal societies can't be successful bc men are violent, controlling, abusive, and cannot let women have anything for themselves. Huh. Nothing new there. Men think they deserve everything, so coming in and just taking it with force would be an unsuccessful society in your opinion? That's your argument? Women couldn't survive, bc men would come in and beat them up and kill them. Sounds like it would be men destroying a community rather than the society being unsuccessful.
You are basically saying, women-only societies wouldn't survive, only bc of the abuse, greed, entitlement and selfishness of men.
Exactly the point we try to make. A society doesn't need bullies to succeed. We dream of a world without living in fear of men and their violence. If men could leave us the fuck alone, and get over their entitlement, we would survive, peacefully.
"Women only societies wouldn't survive bc you need violence and war"
Sigh.
Its mind boggling you think being a violent, thieving, abusive thug is something to be proud of. But then, a high percentage of men lack empathy.
The very fact that they are ABLE to be destroyed is what makes them unsuccessful. Any society that cannot defend itself cannot be successful.
Replace men with nature. Life redistributes resources to the powerful. This is done through the powerful being able to take it from the weak.
Violence and war will always exist. It is the basis of natural selection. Life is a competition and being able to kill your competition will always be beneficial.
I’m not proud of it, I simply accept that it is the reality of nature. It’s mind boggling that you think that you can somehow eliminate competition in a world with scarce resources.