Displaying results 51 through 100 of 574 entries found.

Submitted by ohlovemeMISTA on June 15, 2020, 1:17 p.m. 0 points | 8 comments

Hey, recently my wife and I got into an argument that resulted in me screwing her sister and kicking her out of my house. I told her she’s a fucking slut that needs to learn her place. Is that ok given the fact we got into a heated argument?

Submitted by suicidalwatergoddess on June 15, 2020, 12:09 p.m. 4 points | 1 comment

hey y’all.

so one night I was chatting amongst so called friends and we were high and shit. so I yelled “fun fact!!” (Yes I’m one of those people) And their heads turned to me. I said “did you know that the Old Testament god (which was a dude to them) told them to castrate themselves and they did it :3 .. and the looks on their faces could give life to a corpse. 😹 have a great day.

Submitted by Shibacki on June 15, 2020, 11:48 a.m.

When I was 14, I learned I attracted a lot of older men. I'd catch them following me by schools, my neighborhood, anywhere really.

Cocksucka chin big dick swingin

Submitted by stonebaked1 on June 15, 2020, 9:56 a.m. 0 points | 5 comments

Dwelling in the pit that you all create for yourselves, grasping hold of the most complex unsolved issues of gender equality, you lot absolutely adore being in this space.

Your stand point is completely non-progressive and gets off on hating genuine effort to improve society.

I'm sure you consider yourselves somewhat elite in your thought process but nothing will change without cooperation, noone will understand or want to hear from someone so toxic in compliance.

So on you go, sad chat yourself out of this one with another reason not to try because the odds are against you. Try not to let that ego take over now, I know that will be tough.

Submitted by ssatsugene on June 15, 2020, 9:43 a.m. 18 points | 64 comments

She was killed by a black moid. People on twitter are losing their minds at how such a thing could happen. In a video shortly before her death, she was yelling about about "trans lives matter" too. This girl was only 19, nobody deserves to die that young. But it sickens me that the brainwashing - firstly that black moids deserve or even need "protecting", and secondly that black tranny scrotes are women too, now make her death at their very hands look ironic and sad.

Shit like this should be a case study for us in why female separatism is the only way out. But instead, she's a martyr, who "more of us should be like". Fuck that noise. If I can encourage even 1 other black woman to leave this cause behind and worry about herself, that would be enough for me. I'm so tired of this sick world.

Submitted by Shibacki on June 15, 2020, 9:05 a.m.

Big dick swingin

Fat nuts flayin

Fat nigga singin

Straight gayin

Submitted by TerfsAreBased on June 15, 2020, 8:35 a.m. 1 point | 21 comments
57
Submitted by ssatsugene on June 15, 2020, 8:09 a.m. 1 point | 55 comments

Mine is that misogyny is almost warranted when you look at how inviting most women are to being abused and downtrodden. How willing they are to put everyone but themselves first. How readily they'll throw each other under the bus for even a crumb of male validation or approval. I have zero respect for a majority of women. If I were a moid, I probably would have been a misogynist too.

Of course moids don't hate us for those reasons. They'd hate us even if we were the opposite of all of those things. But the way most women facilitate them victimising us on a collective level, I feel as though maybe they deserve it. Self preservation is something women actively discourage one another from. We are the only female species I can think of who encourage bad logic and decision making skills in each other.

I'm mostly writing this in the heat of frustration at handmaidenry. But I'm curious to know what your most extreme BPF opinion is.

Submitted by becrowl on June 15, 2020, 7:58 a.m. 1 point | 10 comments

Please read this hilarious exchange from ask men...

Q: Do you mean that guys earn my respect, or that I earn the respect of those guys?

Reply: "It’s both. Girl here- I have 4 older brothers, mostly male cousins, grew up in a neighborhood full of boys, worked in college athletics with male teams, and supervised a fraternity house (I.e. lived in the basement and it was my job to kick out girls and take away beer. I was all of 23 at the time. So, pretty much the same age as the guys). While the other girls in that job were scared to deal with them, I seriously never had a problem with them. Sure, they tried to push me over. It’s fine a balance of standing your ground and taking things in stride. The boys will probably do things just to get a reaction. I was mooned every single fire drill. I’d just tell them to pull up their pants and I’d go about my day. The other girls at work freaked out. Of course, that encouraged them. But, I also didn’t treat them like little kids by talking down to them. Other staff constantly got on to them for every little thing. All they did was fight with them. I got their respect. The other staff didn’t. They could tell that I respected them. It’s the same with my guy friends now. I tell them if they cross a line. I ignore most of the stupid crap. If they keep doing it, I’ll walk away (or not hang out with them). If they try to give me crap, I give it right back. It’s all about being able to hold your own. Like another comment said, if you want them to do something, then you can’t do it either."

and later she says... "Most were good guys. Just doing typical harmless, idiot stuff. Like chasing people through a parking lot in a gorilla costume. Not everyone was cut out for the job. There was high turnover."

What the fuck is wrong with most women? lmao. I didn't treat them like little kids but the superior we all know them to be, sure they mooned me, spoke to me like I was a piece of shit, tried to intimidate me into quitting my job, but I was always polite!! Just do as I do, and turn a blind eye, grovel... I earned muh respect! Other girls just aren't cut out!! 😂

Submitted by BlasphemousMaude on June 15, 2020, 5:47 a.m. 1 point | 4 comments

Again, not mine and i can't find the source, but whichever brilliant woman wrote it - thank you.


Trying it would not only be folly but really, really dangerous. Getting up against male power, the core of their power, is getting against their right to access a constant flow of victims to rape, torture and murder. Anything else is just a façade to make that core power possible. If we got anywhere near to threatening the rape and murder power of some of them through patriarchal communication means (denouncing some men in the media, etc) you could easily get persecuted or killed. They sure would react.

There is no man in power (any kind of high status) that isn’t involved in some kind of prostitution ring, BDSM ring, child rape ring, trafficking ring, rape ring, “wife swap” ring, “orgies” ring, etc. Would it either be on the receiver side, organiser side or profit-making side. Rings which will inevitably lead you to a web of drug-dealers, generals, kings, princes, pimps, politicians, presidents, ministers, bankers, insurers, judges, high-ranked policemen, arms traffickers, human traffickers, magistrates, lawyers, well-placed medics, corporate managing directors, nobles and barons, high-ranked state servants, priests and archbishops, the vatican, psychiatrists, solicitors, notaries, heads of institutions (especially social institutions dedicated to helping victims, orphans, disabled children), journalists, highly ranked sports players, etc, etc.

This is what male power looks like and is for. Having access to a constant flow of victims to rape. Some rings that cater to powerful men organise female child hunting games where the point of the game is to shoot the child. Others even organise cannibal orgies or live snuff movie shows. It’s probably more rare, but it exists. There are pimps and traffickers who cater for this kind of “entertainment” for wealthy powerful men, and they earn a lot of money for it. And they get their victims from social services, from abused girls wandering in the streets, from parents (men) selling their children, or from girls in poorer countries.

Only very wealthy men could afford such “services” (live murder, torture, etc) so it is specific to the ruling / managing elite (other men get to do that in different ways but won’t have access to the same organised efficiency and impunity). The higher up men are, the worse and the more organised and invisible the crimes are. And the more dangerous and more protected and well connected they will be.

Getting up against them (against the core of patriarchal network) is getting up against those who meet the arms trafficker who deals with the pimp, who works with the police commander in chief, who knows the judges, who knows members of the ministry, who has contact with the journalists, who supports this and this famous actor or sportsman, who buy drugs and prostituted women from the same pimp everyone knows, etc, etc. They ALL protect each other. Their interest is to keep this quiet so most women don’t know about it and they will eliminate anyone (in speech or for real) who becomes too noisy for their liking.

Submitted by kingxks on June 15, 2020, 4:45 a.m. 1 point | 21 comments
61

Just a thought, but it makes sense.

Historically women more often than not died in child birth. That was how it was for most of human history.

Knowing that, is it possible that men evolved to NOT love women because they knew they would be losing us at some point? Or, if men really were capable of loving women why would they constantly try to kill us with impregnation?

Submitted by nonpenishaver on June 15, 2020, 2:33 a.m. 1 point | 13 comments
63
Submitted by Datingispointless on June 15, 2020, 1:55 a.m. 1 point | 54 comments

I posted this to Gender Critical, but of course they removed my post. The reality is that MANY white and non-black women want to keep and enjoy the privilege that not being a Black woman gives them, the same way black men want to keep and enjoy the privilege that not being a Black woman gives them. I hope people here understand.

======

I said this in another thread and was attacked racially and downvoted without reason.

If you disagree with my logic then at least have the decency to state why.

——-

We were asked what whites women could do to help feminists women of color. My answer is below.

———-

The number one thing non-black feminists can do for Black women is NOT date Black men.

99% (if not more) of black males who date interracially HATE Black women. And so do the white and non-black women that they date, lots of the time.

If you care about the Black race, understand that there are more elegible Black women than men due to prison, deaths, etc. When you as a white or non-black woman even talk to a black man you are spitting into the face of all Black women. You can not call us sisters if you do this.

It is perfectly fine for Black women (both straight and gay) to date and marry outside of the race because the numbers simply aren’t there as far as black men (and gay Black women). And BW who date out don’t do it out of hate for anyone, but out of love. On the other hand, there is literally no reason for black men to date out when there is a surplus of black women to choose from. If you as a white woman date a black man you are turning your back on your Black feminist sisters. You are co-signing the black man’s ideals of white supremacy.

Edit: Those if you who downvote me without refuting anything I’ve said are just upset that I’m telling the truth. Black males who date interracially hate Black women for existing, so if you as a woman decide to be with them you are actively attempting to hurt Black women.

———-

At this point I was racially mocked at this sub by another woman (using language like ho* and get a man, Pickmeisha, etc.)

I explained to her that I am a lesbian with no interest in being involved with men:

I’m literally a lesbian so “getting a man” is the last thing on my mind. Sounds like you’re the actual Pickmeisha. I’m just telling the truth. Black men who date interracially are the biggest supporters of white supremacy I’ve ever seen, and I’m not the only person who has noticed this. If a non-black woman is with a black man it can be safely assumed that she listens to him talk shit about Black women, all with a smile on her face.

——

Then I received a reply from a different woman, telling me that it’s wrong to force black men to date black women. She COMPLETELY glossed over what I said about these black men being white supremacists, so obviously she (as a so called feminist) is not allied with Black women and prioritizes racist black men who hate us.

My response to her:

Right, but the fact remains that most black men who date interracially believe in white supremacy and black inferiority. So if you’re a woman who dates one of these men you are literally playing into white supremacy and stabbing black women in the back. You can’t have it both ways. Either you’re for Black women or you’re against us. And being with a black man as a non-black woman means you have publicly and boldly taken a stance against us. You aren’t fooling anyone. Literally EVERYONE knows that black men who date interracially are white supremacists. I’ve had white female friends who won’t date black men for this very reason, because they don’t want to betray Black women. I don’t give a damn about any excuses you make. Reality is reality.

———

STOP trying to gaslight Black women. We know the reality and we know that black men who date you hate us, talk shit about us, and that you sit back and listen with smiles on your faces.

Want proof?

Just go to Twitter.

Type in “misogynoir” or “this you” or look up the twitter account @misogynoirs.

What these black men do to us is disgusting and you sit back and allow them to say it in front of you because you enjoy white (and non-black) privilege. Time is fucking up.

And keep in mind, none of this is to Black men who stay within the race, or non-black women who don’t date them. I have nothing but respect for those two groups.

But we do have to realize that even outside the real of racial dating, people seem to get a social “credit” for not being a Black woman.

Just as black men never care about the misogyny Black women face, white and non-black women never care about the specific racism (misogynoir) Black women face. You just sit back and enjoy the benefits and privileges NOT being a Black woman affords you.

You can ignore this or remove this or whatever, but in reality you’re just kicking the can down the road. Black men and white women will be held accountable for what you’ve done to Black women. In many ways you are as cruel as white men, in some ways much worse.

Now let the gaslighting commence.

======

That concludes the message that I posted on GC. I believe many white rad fems are just as racist as white lib fems. I did not say all, just many.

What are your thoughts?

Submitted by ihatewomen42 on June 15, 2020, 1:23 a.m.

Well, I'm a man and after reading this subreddit I've come to the realization that it's time to have my fun. You women have given up the fight and it's time for me and my friends to take charge against you. There is no one to fight us and since there is no opponent I guess we've won. You have stopped fighting a battle that you have actually been making good ground on and now I'm allowed to do whatever I want. I always secretly seen women as objets to be used and thrown away like trash, but now that you have stopped oppressing us I can openly say that. Women are useless sluts and the fact that you gave up only secures your date as trash. Goodbye and goodnight.

Sincerely, someone who is better than you

Submitted by Cruxthedestroyer on June 15, 2020, 12:08 a.m. 0 points | 3 comments

I’m male, and I’m curious... why do you hate me and other men that you don’t even know?

Submitted by lmaolmaolmaolmaolma on June 14, 2020, 10:03 p.m. 3 points | 9 comments
69
Submitted by tramselbiso on June 14, 2020, 9:13 p.m. 59 points | 40 comments
70
Submitted by nightstastelikegold on June 14, 2020, 6:59 p.m. 11 points | 13 comments

it’s so obvious to me that every problem in this world has been created by men. men are the cause of their own misery and war, men are the cause of women’s plight. no matter what i do, i am going to spend my life laboring for men in a capitalist society created by men seeking wealth and power. i’m going to spend the majority of my life working with little to no time left over to myself to enjoy things i love or spend time with the women i love, surrounded by violence and misogyny and racism and homophobia. i love children and i want to have daughters someday, but there is no way i could ever raise daughters to face the hopelessness that i am facing. all the men i grew up with have grown up watching hardcore porn through their entire teenage years and conditioning themselves through orgasm to hate women even more than they have through all of history.

i count my blessings that i am a lesbian and can hopefully spend my life with the woman i love, but i still feel so cheated out of life. these are the only years i get and i have to spend them like this? angry, exhausted, stressed, terrified at every turn? i want more. i want a life full of joys and compassion. i don’t see how everything won’t get worse in the 60ish years i have left to survive, if the world doesn’t crash and burn in my lifetime.

i am so defeated and sad. i want happiness in my life. it feels impossible when this is the way it has always been and is getting worse. what is the point?

Submitted by onlyforsex on June 14, 2020, 4:25 p.m. 6 points | 8 comments

Most feminist subs are really soft on calling out moids, and I don't blame them, reddit moids are tyrannical and will harass women's spaces like it's their job.

But what are some subs that take zero shit from moids? Are there any?

Submitted by TerfsAreBased on June 14, 2020, 4:12 p.m. 3 points | 5 comments

View Poll [BROKEN LINK]

Submitted by TerfsAreBased on June 14, 2020, 3:59 p.m. 0 points | 9 comments

"Sex is why women are oppressed, gender is how women are oppressed."

Men oppress women because they're stronger, more sociopathic, tend to have higher IQs and don't bear the burden of pregnancy of childbirth. Women aren't oppressed because they don't wear the same clothes as men or because they use makeup and wear heels, nor because they don't behave the same way as men.

Surely it would be better if women were more focused on getting useful degrees, making money, learning how to use guns and working on building strength. But these things all have their limits that are determined by biological factors. You'll never have a woman who is the strongest athlete in the world, because there will always be a male who is stronger and faster. You can't have more women in STEM if they're just not good at it, and instead prefer social work over high-level mathematics. You can't have more women in business, banking, politics if they lack the deceitfulness and exploitativeness needed to succeed in these fields(eg Steve Jobs who stole his friend's Steve Wozniak's ideas and passed them off as his own, Jeff Bezos who doesn't pay living wages to Amazon workers, just to name a few)

Even if we focused on making women more sociopathic by socializing them to be such, the biology will eventually take its toll and a woman with learned 'sociopathy' will sink back to her natural behaviours, or will be surpassed by a man who's sociopathy comes naturally to him and therefore he can execute it effortlessly, without wasting energy on inevitable guilt, shame etc. that comes with being selfish and fucking people over for your gain.

In the past, and even today although to a lesser degree, it all comes down to brute force. Maybe in a fully automated world in the future the physical strength will become redundant, but then intelligence+sociopathy will prevail and men tend to be better at both.

Even a state itself is defined by its power to monopolize and use force and the threat of force.

No matter how much we've progressed and how socialized we are, the one who has more power will always threaten, intimidate, control and blackmail those will less power. The gender relations we see is just a micro world where we can observe this dynamic on an everyday basis.

Submitted by Douchewithalute on June 14, 2020, 2:35 p.m. 36 points | 84 comments

I have seen it few times mentioned here. It seems like one of the ways women fuck each other over is hating each other just for being attractiv. Without any other reason.

I have experienced it first hand. Since I was a young girl people think I am pretty (I just accepted it at some point). And oh my ladys, did other women hate me for it. It started in elementary school with groups of girls picking on me only but not my other friends.

I tought this would be over when I am an adult. NOPE. Seldom have I been more wrong.

Recently I got out of a hobby group because a woman there treated me like I was air and when she noticed me she was very cold to straight up rude to me. I tought I was hallucinating and asked other group members. No one could give me a good reason why she acted that way.

I am speaking of a good looking woman in her thirties. She had everything I obviously did not have. A (much younger) partner, a well payed career that comes with authority, car, big apartment, close family ties, big circle of friends. But this was not enough for her.

I never tried to compete with her. I am openly lesbian so I am no actual threat to her. And I always wore big shirts and no make up when we met. I do not get what she was seeing in me.

This is one of the reasons why I do not think women can be helped. They fuck each other over for petty reasons all the time wich all come down to:

(male) validation.

Submitted by Whelsey on June 14, 2020, 12:47 p.m. 41 points | 22 comments

My cat is on heat and my father and uncle are so disgusting, they are literally making sexual comments about how my cat is asking for dick, how she's horny, how she's naughty. It makes me so uncomfortable, I feel like I'm in between two pigs and honestly kinda scared.

77
Submitted by Medea345 on June 14, 2020, 8:47 a.m. 1 point | 4 comments
78
Submitted by darkhorse8419 on June 14, 2020, 8:19 a.m. 1 point | 11 comments

All men deep down inside are completely fine with abortion. The conservative ones have been known to have no problem asking that of the women they don’t want to be forced to have ties with. I had always really wondered why liberal men wouldn’t be fighting alongside women for our reproductive rights. I finally realized that this is their revenge for having to contribute to the life they helped, or forced to create. As if we don’t know by now, how babies are born. I always knew this was the conservative man’s way of forcing his preferred sex slave into possible indentured servitude Then I got to thinking. As much as men like to claim they were “tricked”. They made the choice to ejaculate inside of a woman after thousands of years of evidence based research of what could happen. These liberal men know about birth control rejection/ failure, condoms breaking, rape, etc. they spout out all the facts when passively defending our right to abortion. However, they themselves find it perfectly okay to ejaculate inside of women. Knowing the risks of death to mother and child, knowing that they have no want to be tied to this particular woman for the rest of their lives, knowing they have no desire to be parents, and worst of all..: knowing a woman WILL attempt an unsafe abortion and possibly die. If legal means aren’t afforded to her? So why do liberal men still ejaculate inside of women without a second care? You can blame biology for the sociopathic nature of men. I don’t care anymore that men are punishing us for not allowing them to be the human germinators nature evolved them to be. I wish all women would wake up to the truth of what all men are. Imagine if you will, if all women who were able to consent, enacted a sex ban to protest abortion rights. How long do you think these liberal men would allow their veneer of sincerity and honesty to stay up? How long before the rape and hearings start? How long before men put their ego aside of wanting to be seen as protectors and hero’s? How long before we go back to tribal days of being dragged into the woods? Men grew tired of seeing us afraid, so they devised a new game of pretending to have empathy, because somewhere along the line, they started feeling guilty about what they truly are, not guilty enough to pull their own weight, and not drain the life out of you, but guilty enough not to murder more than three women a day. Anyways, men are just not evolving fast enough for me.

Submitted by ssatsugene on June 14, 2020, 6:51 a.m. 1 point | 58 comments

I've never been able to see past the fact they're still men. A lot of women seem to forget that and give them more passes than they'd give even their female friends/family. The groping, their gross imitation of femininity, the way they openly talk about how disgusting they think vaginas are, their unsolicited opinions on what we wear and how we look, just everything.

They annoy me more than even the average hetero scrote, because they have an additional set of problems. The usual misogyny and contempt for women, but with an added sense of over-familiarity. They think they can talk to and treat us any way they want, simply bc the straight douchebros bullied them when they were children. I've seen countless videos on twitter and the internet of gay moids beating up women.

For some reason this is particularly prevalent among gay black moids (I'm black myself). I just find them hideous as a category of people. Of course there are a few outliers, and when I say that I don't care about homophobia affecting them, I don't mean violence. But even so, they're still all men. It's just male on male violence. I don't feel any natural allyship with them and I wish more women would stop pretending they're the "good" kind of moid. Because they're not.

Submitted by SomeFujoshi on June 14, 2020, 5:35 a.m. 1 point | 9 comments

jesus, can men just mind their own business for a fucking second? Had some try to convince me they aren't shit with shitty condescension and aggression. Like you're only making me well aware that you are, but ok. Sorry just a rant.

Submitted by Vibrantsun on June 14, 2020, 2:29 a.m. 1 point | 7 comments

These days I look back at my early 20s & see how much time I wasted thinking about & dating dudes.

Back then I use to believe in the concept of "the one". I use to get so miserable because of dudes. Spent money on them too at times. I feel so depressed when I think about it.

How does one recover from living a libfem life? Everyday I think of the horror I put myself through & can't seem to forgive myself.

Submitted by fdsforlife on June 13, 2020, 11:51 p.m. 10 points | 10 comments

I'm tired of women advising each other to be easy victims.

Women advice each other that they have to make excuses for not being interested in a guy. You have to pretend to have a boyfriend (owner). You have to give him your number and later block/delete. You have to politely respond to you weird ex-colleague's facebook messages and carefully and skilled let the conversation fizzle out. You have to be vague, polite and giggly while you try to make some dude understand that you'd totally fuck him if only you had met each other at a better time. If you aren't a passive pushover, he might kill you they warn.

Men look for easy victims. Yes, he might have a fit and kill you if you say no to him, but you're way more likely to end up a victim if you're a passive pushover who lets him cross your boundaries. Men test how much they can get away with and predators look for women who have poor boundaries and can't stand up for themselves.

You giving in to him after a bit of pressure makes him think nice! an easy target.

Submitted by [deleted] on June 13, 2020, 8:21 p.m.

[deleted]

86

As this sub has grown, there is an increasing number of new users who seem to not have read the sticky. This is a reminder that BlackPillFeminism isn't just another generic radfem sub. BPF is defined by two main ideas:

1. Biological realism. Men evolved to oppress women. Women evolved to submit to the oppression. This is why most women, even self identified feminists, support patriarchy and always will.

2. Pessimism. Once we accept the male supremacy is the inevitable result of human nature, then we must accept that the fight is lost. Only solutions that BPF can take seriously are those that acknowledge human nature, like female separatism (with the understanding that most women will never separate from men willingly).

From now on, we will start banning users who make posts that clear show a lack of understanding of these basic ideas. There are plenty of spaces where women can post generic misandrist rants, discuss socialization or bash those of us who have given up. Go post on those spaces.

Submitted by [deleted] on June 13, 2020, 11:33 a.m. 56 points | 4 comments

[deleted]

Submitted by TerfsAreBased on June 13, 2020, 10:18 a.m. 7 points | 13 comments

I mean, if you already went all the way through, pass as a male and people treat you as such why the hell would you go back to the life of being constantly patronized, not taken seriously and sexually harassed?

Even if they're short, being a short man is still better than being a short woman.

They could just live stealth, aka not telling anyone that they're trans and go on with life.

Is it because their family/friends discriminate against them? Is it cause they miss the male attention? Fear of consequences of taking testosterone?

I wanna hear what y'all think because I doubt they would tell the real truth without sugarcoating it

Submitted by FractalMantid on June 13, 2020, 9:04 a.m. 23 points | 13 comments

The most blackpilled character in a major Hollywood blockbuster might be Sarah Connor from Terminator 2. It's an action movie about time travel and killer robots.

In one scene, Sarah Connor confronts Miles Dyson, the researcher who developed the AI that would eventually start a nuclear war. He's dismayed that he's being blamed for something he hasn't done yet.

MILES DYSON: How were we suppose to know?
SARAH CONNOR: Right. How are you supposed to know? Fucking men like you built the hydrogen bomb. Men like you thought it up. You think you're so creative. You don't know what it's like to really create something; to create a life; to feel it growing inside you. All you know how to create is death and destruction.

In another scene, she watches her son spend quality time with a killer robot from the future sent back to protect him.

Watching John with the machine, it was suddenly so clear. The terminator would never stop. It would never leave him. It would never hurt him, never shout at him, or get drunk and hit him, or say it was too busy to spend time with him. It would always be there. And it would die to protect him. Of all the would-be fathers who came and went over the years, this thing, this machine was the only one that measured up. In an insane world, it was the sanest choice.
Mad Max: Fury Road indirectly blamed men for the apocalypse ("Who killed the world?"). There's also this part:
KEEPER OF THE SEEDS: You having a baby?
THE DAG: Warlord Junior. Gonna be so ugly.
KEEPER OF THE SEEDS: It could be a girl.

Feel free to add more.

Submitted by TerfsAreBased on June 13, 2020, 6:03 a.m. 35 points | 26 comments

Libfem: Um sweaty yeah I mean what he did was bad, but he was mixed race, trans and had autism. Don't you think that criticizing him is a bit racist, transphobic and ableist?

GC radfem: Ugh, this pesky male socialization strikes again! This wouldn't have happened if he hadn't watched porn and played violent video games!

Leftist: It's the capitalism's fault, he was alienated. See, this is why we need to outlaw guns and legalize prostitution.

Alt-right: Did you guys know that 50% of the mass shooters in the US have been 0,008% non-white? This is why we need to enforce stricter border control!

MRAs: OF COURSE he went on a shooting spree, he was raised by a single mother. If the courts didn't favor moms over dads and let the wives divorce-rape their husbands, he would've grown up to be the new Elon Musk.

RedPill: He should've just held frame, bro. Save up his RobinHood profit go to Thailand to practice cold approaching. At least his dread game was on point, haha.

Murder of James Bulger

James Patrick Bulger (16 March 1990[1] – 12 February 1993) was a 2-year-old boy from Kirkby, Merseyside, England, who was abducted, tortured and killed by two 10-year-old boys, Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, on Friday, 12 February 1993.[2][3] Bulger was led away from the New Strand Shopping Centre in Bootle as his mother had taken her eyes off him momentarily. His mutilated body was found on a railway line 2.5 miles (4 km) away in Walton, Liverpool, two days after his abduction. Thompson and Venables were charged on 20 February 1993 with Bulger's abduction and murder.

...

One of the boys threw blue Humbrol modelling paint, which they had shoplifted earlier, into Bulger's left eye.[21] They kicked him, stamped on him and threw bricks and stones at him. Batteries were placed in Bulger's mouth and,[22] according to police, some batteries may have been inserted into his anus, although none were found there.[3] Finally, the boys dropped a 10-kilogram (22 lb) iron bar, described in court as a railway fishplate, on Bulger.[23][24][25] He sustained 10 skull fractures as a result of the bar striking his head. Alan Williams, the case's pathologist, stated that Bulger suffered so many injuries—42 in total—that none could be isolated as the fatal blow.[26] Thompson and Venables laid Bulger across the railway tracks and weighted his head down with rubble, in the hope that a train would hit him and make his death appear to be an accident. After they left the scene, his body was cut in half by a train.[27] Bulger's severed body was discovered two days later on 14 February.[8] A forensic pathologist testified that he had died before he was struck by the train.[27]

Police suspected that there was a sexual element to the crime, since Bulger's shoes, socks, trousers and underpants had been removed. The pathologist's report, which was read out in court, found that Bulger's foreskin had been forcibly pulled back.[23][28] When Thompson and Venables were questioned about this aspect of the attack by detectives and a child psychiatrist, Eileen Vizard, the pair were reluctant to give details and also denied inserting some of the batteries into Bulger's anus.[3][20][29] At his eventual parole, Venables's psychiatrist, Susan Bailey, reported that "visiting and revisiting the issue with Jon as a child, and now as an adolescent, he gives no account of any sexual element to the offence."[3]

Full article: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

Submitted by [deleted] on June 13, 2020, 4:47 a.m. 17 points | 52 comments

• Men are very sex-based horny pig creatures who feel like fucking most of the time.

• Their sexuality is naturally predatory, bordering on rapey; they think with their dick.

• The moment man see a beautiful attractive woman, his urge is to grab her, pin her down and start sucking face and fucking her violently.

• Man can interpret everything a woman does to mean as sexual, even if it's a common thing she's doing, like scrubbing floors, eating, sitting, whatever. This is what helps men to hamster that "she's asking for it!", in hope to excuse themselves from their creep and molesty behaviour, if they did something.

• Literally just by having a vagina and looking beautiful, men already think you are doing "rape bait" and signalling for their attention. That's why M.E. women have to cover up fully and wear a veil to "not arouse a man accidentally". Fucking shit. Why is it implied women should try to look "plain" or reduce their attractiveness if they don't want to "rape bait"?! Not a natural state(especially if 7/10 attractive or higher), inconvenient(hot weather, careful movement) and dreary(not wearing colorful clothes, different styles) just for men to "control themselves"!

• If the woman has a high SMV, men will stop at nothing until they get sex out of her. Even try to be her friend(fake acting) and get close to her, the point being to win her trust. Then, one day, go ham. Hence a lot of rape victims' rapists are always someone they know.

• Men are nice to attractive women only for sex. Men's "kindness"(fake act) to said women, men think it is a form of currency, so they expect, no, demand sex in return for their "transaction".

• Pumping and dumping comes easy for men, thats why they do it. Since they are only interested in gaming a woman for sex and after they "experience" her body, the mystery is gone, so they dump.

• Men who go through the whole trouble of lying, manipulating, and gaming women are still wanton for pussy, and hamstering it off as a "make her give you pussy via 'strategy'" way. The only true non-simps are MGTOW who GTOW, because their game doesn't get pussy involved, "don't need it".

• Even if you reject a man, he may still force himself on you with his strength and rape or abuse you.

• Male validation is shallow and worthless, not empowering. Only for access to pussy and don't care about the woman.

Do add on if you have more.

Submitted by radicalXXfreedom on June 13, 2020, 3:42 a.m. 4 points | 16 comments

Men can always use force - I.e. rape. Women’s “choice” is only guaranteed by the men who choose to protect her, but those men, such as her fathers and brothers, do so only because she is their property and they exert control over who she chooses to marry (have sex with)

There’s no such thing as true female choice.

Submitted by Vibrantsun on June 13, 2020, 3:05 a.m. 20 points | 95 comments

Is their a reason why radical femininsts like to coddle each other?

I'm in all sorts of radfem groups & these women don't live their lives any different from women who barely know about feminism.

They all are married or pursuing marriage. In abusive relationships & won't leave. Are raising sons. The list goes on.

They blame the detrimental decisions women make on "socialization". Like hun, what woman is socialized into believing a man is a woman?

Why do women have a hard time believing that despite all the books they read & knowledge they have, they are failures.

They hate libfem doctrine but live by it.

Why are you calling yourself a radfem & yet have no praxis?

Submitted by vodkacrans on June 13, 2020, 12:44 a.m. 47 points | 29 comments

title says it all. i found this sub on accident and it resonated with me after gradually losing my mind in "reformation and education" feminist circles. i got tired of denying that i genuinely hated men and boys and wished they'd disappear (because you'll get called an extremist for saying you hate misogynistic little boys apparently), and i hated the women who aided them in their violent behavior (got diagnosed with internalized misogyny for that one). i already knew men were hopeless, but not necessarily that there was no hope for women. i was sort of lying to myself at the end though, especially after some personal circumstances where the women around me refused to give their abusers up and let their abusive men hurt me in the process. i feel like i knew this deep down but i was just being nihilistic and negative, not realistic. whatever.

i feel like shit basically. i was already a separatist and i've never been in a relationship with a man or had sex with one and the thought of never doing those things is great to me. my dream was to move somewhere more rural, live off grid, and find a way to work from home with a lot of my female friends so it was more affordable, i wasn't overburdened with work, and i was never lonely. it just hit me how difficult this plan would be and how long i'd have to wait to get there. i can barely maintain female friendships because i'm at a stage in my life where all of the women i know are either dating men and can't bother with anything else, getting married, or popping out babies. the prospect of an economic crisis here in the states because of the coronavirus isn't helping with the shit-feeling either. i also cannot fucking stand working around men and having them decide my wages and whether or not i deserve basic necessities for survival. men love their roleplaying and it annoys the fuck out of me that i'm forced to participate or die.

i feel like i'm grieving for the hopefulness i had before. this sucks. i knew things were bad but this feels unreal. i know this'll probably pass over time and i settle with the realizations i've had in the last two days but it's terrible. i don't see the point in anything. i don't know how to stop feeling overwhelmed by that fact.

Submitted by kt0998 on June 12, 2020, 9:57 p.m. 82 points | 37 comments

https://uproxx.com/movies/365-days-netflix-fifty-shades-of-grey-porn/

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/365-days-netflix-stream-sex-scene-plot-50-shades-lockdown-books-a9562251.html

There are so many things wrong with this film. Within the first 15 minutes, the character Massimo has already forced a flight attendant on his private jet to perform oral sex on him. Another five minutes and Laura has been kidnapped, with Massimo informing her that he will have her parents killed if she tries to escape. When she does try, she runs into Massimo executing a former member of his crime family for luring young girls into sex work – a transparent attempt to make him seem redeemable. (Spoiler alert: he’s not.)
It’s fine, though, because the next day Massimo gives Laura a nice breakfast and takes her shopping. He later forces her onto his jet and sexually assaults her on the way to Rome. Then he chains her to a bed and forces her to watch as a sex worker performs oral sex on him. When a member of a rival family tries to rape her, he blames her for it, knocks her off his yacht, then pulls her out of the water and tells her that was her fault, too. When she recovers from yet another fainting spell (she does that a lot), she initiates sex in a seven-minute scene that is the closest thing to mediocre porn Netflix has ever released.

All this from woke-Netflix. No doubt this shit will be eaten up by all the libfems and their "male allies". Demented misogynist porn is mainstream entertainment now after all. Just kill feminism already and admit that people loving nothing on this planet more than male dominance.