Gender Identity Nondiscrimination Laws in Public Accommodations: a Review of Evidence Regarding Safety and Privacy in Public Restrooms, Locker Rooms, and Changing Rooms

Submitted July 10, 2020, 10:35 a.m. by user98710

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13178-018-0335-z

7 comments recovered from the Pushshift database.
AutoModeratorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord · July 10, 2020, 10:35 a.m.

The sub is currently restricted and being held by your same mod team. It's "under construction" and inactive, and not being used except for us mods tinkering with design.

You don't need to message us to be added or approved. As soon as we get banned here, we will open up to the public over there. So just keep the bookmark handy.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

SnapshillBotMod-Identified Bot · July 10, 2020, 10:40 a.m.

I'm a bot that automatically archives posts in this sub.

If you prefer not to "give clicks" to what is posted here, please visit one of the snapshots linked below.

Snapshots:

1. Gender Identity Nondiscrimination L... - archive.org

I am just a simple bot, not a moderator of this subreddit | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

fu4922 · July 10, 2020, 11:46 a.m.

Today it’s gender “identity” tomorrow it will be other forms of self-identification nonsense.

Today’s fraud is tomorrow’s empathy backed by medical experimentation.

Identify as a minor, demand access to children’s spaces. Identify as aged, demand senior benefits. Identify as a different ethnicity, appropriate that ethnicity’s history. Identify as credentialed, demand academic recognition. Identify as disabled, demand consideration as disabled.

snub-nosedmonkey · July 10, 2020, 11:51 a.m. · 1 reply

I only have access to the abstract and I'm not familiar with all the terminology. Was this study comparing public access to spaces based on gender identity (i.e someone identifies as a female so can use a female bathroom) against the regular system (use the female bathroom if you have a vagina)?

SorryDadImGay · July 10, 2020, 12:19 p.m.

You can use sci-hub.tw to read it, so that you understand what it says.

Q-Continuum-kin · July 10, 2020, 12:21 p.m.

The bathroom issue has always been something I think is overly dramatic on both sides. We should be delineating the difference between using the toilet and using a locker room.

Also keep in mind that this is a study about Massachusetts which is a fairly wealthy, low crime, high acceptance - state. Unless it says differently behind the payroll, the places with the gender inclusive bathroom ordinances are very rich hipster neighborhoods like Summerville. Idk if they can correct for neighborhood wealth.

WavingVoid · July 10, 2020, 12:29 p.m.

Removing, we're not a sub to talk about how gender identity impacts society as a whole and/or other groups.

We're an LGB separatist sub, you need to keep the focus on us please.