13 comments recovered from the Pushshift database.
crispycherrypie · June 28, 2020, 10:06 p.m.
Whomp there it is. Being a lesbian is transphobic.
Salty-Tomorrow · June 28, 2020, 10:37 p.m.
It’s almost like any disagreement with a trans person is transphobia....
Tweeders55 · June 28, 2020, 10:44 p.m. · 1 reply
Oye. Not one gay guy that I know would purchase hormones to be a woman. They would purchase them to be more buff beefcake honey.
Tweeders55 · June 28, 2020, 10:50 p.m.
Would and have paid for lipo for that more sculpted Adonis look true. Cutting off their penises? Nope. Peen is their favorite organ. Maybe a trim if it's too saggy but nothing noticeable.
DontDoxxMe_BroDone being Nice · June 28, 2020, 11:07 p.m.
But those definitions aren’t changing for men 🧐 That fluidity doesn’t come for Mans definitions.
creamtart_ · June 28, 2020, 11:20 p.m.
Yikes. Grasping at straws much?
HestieG · June 29, 2020, 12:39 a.m.
Why are these people so thirsty???!?!?!?!?!? Sorry, you didn't get your return on investment. It's so desperately rapey.
a_blue_bird · June 29, 2020, 12:54 a.m.
language is fluid and changes constantly
So they admit that in order to include TIMs into ''lesbian'' the definition needs to change? Yeah, we agree then.
BellaSwansPet · June 29, 2020, 1:37 a.m.
I hate it when they say “language changes constantly”, because it mostly refers to adding new vocabulary as “nouns”. They can’t hardly change the meaning of a word because that would depend in making every single person in the world use it with the new meaning, which is impossible. Specially with words like “cis”, “lesbians”, “sexuality”, etc. People on the Internet might be loud about them, but in real life they’re a minority.
Of course there are a few exceptions, for example, in the Spanish dictionary, the Academy has had to change the way they presented a few concepts because they were sexist towards women. But they still haven’t agree in adding gender neutral pronouns and adjectives, which I’m thankful for that. Because the only thing they do is to erase women even more in our vocabulary.
farligttyg · June 29, 2020, 2:37 a.m.
"Some of them (transwomen) are gonna be lesbian..."
Less than 2% of all females identify as homosexual. Meanwhile, the number of TIMs identifying as "lesbian" must at least be 50%, if not a lot more.
How fucking come, if they're supposed to be actual women/females? I mean, shouldn't at least 95% of them be "heterosexual"?
It's the goddamn straights, that's what it is, trying to infiltrate our community. Gross...
i_am_so_over_it · June 29, 2020, 6:17 a.m.
I had to sit through a torturous "LGBTQ" training at work (no LGB, just TQ) and they kept referring to gays and lesbians as same gender attracted. I wanted to flip the table and scream, "you're erasing gays and lesbians!"
They had a list of slurs against the LGBTQ community and one was "Lesbian (not really a bad word)." Can't make this shit up.
billybutchersbabe · June 29, 2020, 7:47 a.m. · 1 reply
Men will really come up with any way to force you to fuck them.
Whomp there it is. Being a lesbian is transphobic.
It’s almost like any disagreement with a trans person is transphobia....
Oye. Not one gay guy that I know would purchase hormones to be a woman. They would purchase them to be more buff beefcake honey.
Would and have paid for lipo for that more sculpted Adonis look true. Cutting off their penises? Nope. Peen is their favorite organ. Maybe a trim if it's too saggy but nothing noticeable.
But those definitions aren’t changing for men 🧐 That fluidity doesn’t come for Mans definitions.
Yikes. Grasping at straws much?
Why are these people so thirsty???!?!?!?!?!? Sorry, you didn't get your return on investment. It's so desperately rapey.
So they admit that in order to include TIMs into ''lesbian'' the definition needs to change? Yeah, we agree then.
I hate it when they say “language changes constantly”, because it mostly refers to adding new vocabulary as “nouns”. They can’t hardly change the meaning of a word because that would depend in making every single person in the world use it with the new meaning, which is impossible. Specially with words like “cis”, “lesbians”, “sexuality”, etc. People on the Internet might be loud about them, but in real life they’re a minority.
Of course there are a few exceptions, for example, in the Spanish dictionary, the Academy has had to change the way they presented a few concepts because they were sexist towards women. But they still haven’t agree in adding gender neutral pronouns and adjectives, which I’m thankful for that. Because the only thing they do is to erase women even more in our vocabulary.
"Some of them (transwomen) are gonna be lesbian..."
Less than 2% of all females identify as homosexual. Meanwhile, the number of TIMs identifying as "lesbian" must at least be 50%, if not a lot more.
How fucking come, if they're supposed to be actual women/females? I mean, shouldn't at least 95% of them be "heterosexual"?
It's the goddamn straights, that's what it is, trying to infiltrate our community. Gross...
I had to sit through a torturous "LGBTQ" training at work (no LGB, just TQ) and they kept referring to gays and lesbians as same gender attracted. I wanted to flip the table and scream, "you're erasing gays and lesbians!"
They had a list of slurs against the LGBTQ community and one was "Lesbian (not really a bad word)." Can't make this shit up.
Men will really come up with any way to force you to fuck them.
“No” is a transfobic slur! /s